Clio vs. MyCase: A Complete Comparison Guide
Clio vs. MyCase: A Complete Comparison Guide
Choosing the right practice management software for your law firm can feel overwhelming, especially when you have two great options like Clio and MyCase.
Both platforms offer excellent features designed to help you streamline your daily operations. Not to mention the fact that they show up on all the ‘best of’ guides for practice management software.
But which one is right for your firm?
We’re breaking down the must-know features, differences, and pricing details so you can zero in on the solution that will help your practice thrive. Let’s get into what Clio and MyCase have to offer and how they stack up against each other.
What is Briefpoint?
Before anything else, let’s introduce Briefpoint, an AI-powered discovery document automation tool that lets legal professionals prepare discovery responses and request documents within minutes.
Instead of spending hours copying and pasting or manually writing these documents, Briefpoint lets you automate the whole process.
How does it work? You just have to upload your discovery request, and Briefpoint’s AI system will automatically extract as much information as it can, including routine data like case numbers, court names, parties, and more.
Then, it fills out routine data within your brief. At this point, you can add objections by clicking the interrogatories you want to include.
Briefpoint lets you download the document at any point so you can add finishing touches to Word.
Briefpoint also has Bridge, a built-in tool that gathers client input and simplifies complex legal terminology into plain English.
It then shares this information with your clients and seamlessly incorporates their feedback into your working documents without back-and-forth emailing.
Test Briefpoint yourself by scheduling a demo here.
What is Clio?
Clio is a cloud-based legal practice management software that’s designed to make running a law firm a whole lot easier.
It helps you handle everything from case management and document organization to tracking time and billing clients.
Whether you’re a solo lawyer or part of a larger firm, Clio is one of the best options for an all-in-one legal practice management system.
One of its biggest perks is how it connects with other tools you’re probably already using, like Google Workspace or Microsoft 365. So, if you’re looking to iron out your workflow and keep things organized, Clio might be just what your firm needs.
Despite Clio being an extremely popular tool for legal professionals seeking an intuitive practice management software, it has a worthy rival: MyCase.
What is MyCase?
MyCase is a straightforward, cloud-based legal management tool designed to help law firms handle their daily operations smoothly.
Like Clio, it’s all about making things easier—whether it’s organizing cases, tracking time, managing documents, or billing clients.
One of its key strengths is the built-in and secure client portal, where you can communicate and share documents with your clients without the hassle of extra emails.
Law firms with smaller teams love MyCase because it’s a breeze to navigate, leaving them more time to focus on more valuable work.
Clio vs MyCase: Feature Comparison
When it comes to comparing Clio and MyCase, it’s important to break down their key features and see how they stack up against each other.
At first glance, the two platforms seem to offer a lot of the same features, but as you dig deeper, you’ll find they have distinct approaches to case management, client intake, document organization, and the financial aspects of running a business.
Case Management
Clio offers a robust case management system that’s designed to keep everything organized. You can track case timelines, store related documents, and even collaborate with your team.
Plus, it’s customizable, letting you adjust workflows to fit how your firm operates, and integrates with a variety of other tools, giving you a lot of flexibility.
MyCase also provides a solid case management system, but it leans a little more into simplicity. With a case management system that’s sturdy and reliable, the slight trade-off is a user interface that’s straightforward and easy to grasp.
You can organize cases, assign tasks, and track case progress without too much hassle and even if you have limited technical expertise.
However, MyCase has a significant edge in client communication—its portal allows for easy client updates and collaboration, making it super convenient for keeping clients in the loop.
Client Intake and Lead Management
Clio offers customizable client intake forms that you can embed on your website to streamline the onboarding process for new clients. It automates a lot of the data entry and contact management, which make it faster and easier for both your firm and your clients.
Aside from client management, Clio also integrates lead management features. This means you can track potential clients from their initial inquiry to becoming active clients, all in one platform.
On the other hand, MyCase offers a more basic client intake feature, which covers the essentials but doesn’t offer as much customization.
It gets the job done for firms that are looking for a simple, straightforward intake process, but if you want more flexibility, Clio has the edge here. However, it lacks lead management features.
Document Management
Clio’s document management system is highly secure and easy to navigate. It lets you store, organize, and share documents both within your team and with clients or third parties. Better yet, the platform integrates with tools like Google Drive, Dropbox, and OneDrive, so it’s easy to keep everything in sync.
MyCase also provides document storage and sharing, but, again, with a more user-friendly interface. It may not have as many third-party integrations as Clio, but it makes up for it with simplicity. If ease of use is your priority, MyCase might be more up your alley.
Billing and Time Tracking
Clio offers a comprehensive billing system that includes time tracking, invoicing, and expense management.
You can track your time directly within the platform and then convert that into professional-looking invoices. Clio’s billing system is customizable, which gives you more control over how you bill clients and manage your firm’s finances.
MyCase also offers billing and time tracking, but it focuses on keeping things as simple as possible. Its invoicing system is easy to navigate, allowing you to create and send invoices with just a few clicks. While it might not be as customizable as Clio, it’s perfect for firms that want a quick, no-fuss solution.
Payment Processes
Clio makes it easy for clients to pay with Clio Payments, a built-in feature that allows for secure online payments via credit card or bank transfer. You can set up automated reminders, which helps make sure you get paid faster. Plus, Clio’s payment processing integrates seamlessly with its billing system.
MyCase has built-in payment processing, integrating with LawPay to handle online payments. It supports credit card payments and allows for partial payments, which can be useful for clients who prefer to pay in installments. MyCase also provides automatic payment reminders so it’s easier to stay on top of billing.
Clio vs. MyCase: Key Differences
As you can see, Clio and MyCase have plenty in common, but their differences can help you figure out which one is the better fit for your law firm.
Target Market
Clio is designed to cater to a wide range of law firms, from solo practitioners to larger, multi-lawyer firms. Its broad feature set and extensive integrations make it especially appealing to firms that handle complex cases or need automated workflows and more advanced tools to manage a larger volume of work.
Because of its flexibility, Clio tends to attract firms that are willing to spend time learning the ins and outs of a more customizable platform.
MyCase, on the other hand, is primarily aimed at small to mid-sized law firms that value simplicity and ease of use. It’s particularly popular among firms that want to get up and running quickly without a steep learning curve.
Additionally, MyCase’s focus on client communication and straightforward design makes it a favorite for firms that don’t need a lot of customization but still want a solid, dependable tool for managing cases and expense tracking.
Key Features
What is each platform known for? One of Clio’s standout features is its deep integration capabilities. With over 200 third-party app integrations, Clio is great for firms that need a highly customizable and flexible system. Whether you want to integrate with email tools, accounting software, or case research tools, Clio likely has an option for it.
While MyCase may not offer the same breadth of integrations as Clio, it makes up for it with its client portal, which is incredibly easy to use. The portal allows clients to view case updates, share documents, and communicate directly with their attorney, all in one place.
This focus on simplifying client communication is one of MyCase’s strongest selling points, particularly for firms that want to improve how they interact with clients without needing to fiddle with a bunch of settings.
Ease of Use
Clio offers a lot of functionality, but that comes with a bit of a learning curve. It’s not overly complex, but if you want to take full advantage of everything Clio has to offer, you’ll likely need some time to get familiar with its features.
MyCase is known for its ease of use. It’s designed to be intuitive, and most users can get started quickly with minimal training.
So, if you’re looking for a system that won’t take much time to learn and doesn’t require a ton of customization, MyCase might be the better choice. Its intuitive interface makes it ideal for firms that want to focus on getting work done without getting bogged down in tech.
Pricing Structure
Clio offers four main pricing plans—EasyStart, Essentials, Advanced, and Complete—allowing firms to choose the level of functionality they need. While Clio tends to be on the pricier side (starting at $49 per user per month), especially for the more feature-rich plans like Clio Manage and Clio Grow, you’re paying for access to a wide array of tools and integrations.
Clio’s pricing is flexible enough that solo practitioners can get a good deal, while larger firms can scale up for more advanced needs.
MyCase keeps things simple with just one pricing plan starting at $49 per user per month, which includes most of the platform’s core features. This flat-rate approach makes it easy to know exactly what you’re getting without worrying about hidden costs or additional fees for extra features.
While this simplicity can be a good thing, it may not provide the level of flexibility that firms with more specific needs are looking for.
Which One is Better For Your Law Firm?
The choice between Clio and MyCase really depends on your firm’s specific needs. Both platforms offer excellent features, but they cater to slightly different types of law firms.
If your firm needs a more feature-rich system with greater flexibility and customization, Clio might be the better fit. However, if you’re looking for something more straightforward and easy to use, with a focus on client communication, MyCase could be just what you need.
To help make your decision easier, here’s a quick comparison:
Complete Your Tech Stack With Briefpoint
No matter whether you choose Clio or MyCase, having the right tools to complement your practice management software is a must. That’s where Briefpoint comes in.
Briefpoint is an AI-powered tool designed to automate discovery document drafting, which, as we all know, is usually an extremely tedious task.
When you integrate Briefpoint into your tech stack, you can significantly reduce the time spent on creating requests for admission, requests for production, interrogatories, and more.
You’ll also get Briefpoint Bridge, a built-in feature that collects client input and translates complex legal terms into plain, easy-to-understand language. From there, it shares the information with your clients and effortlessly integrates their feedback into your working documents.
Whether you’re using Clio or MyCase, Briefpoint works seamlessly to maximize your productivity and make document creation more efficient. It’s a great addition for any law firm looking to streamline operations and focus more on high-value legal work rather than getting bogged down in administrative tasks.
Trusted by over 500 law firms, Briefpoint helps create requests for production, admission, interrogatories, and more.
Want to see it in action? Book a demo today!
Save Even More With Discovery Automation
Discovery responses cost firms $23,240, per year, per attorney. $23,240 estimate assumes an associate attorney salary of $150,000 (including benefits – or $83 an hour), 20 cases per year/per associate, 4 discovery sets per case, 30 questions per set, 3.5 hours spent responding to each set, and 1800 hours of billable hours per year.
Under these assumptions, you save $20,477 using Briefpoint, per year, per attorney.
Test Briefpoint yourself by scheduling a demo here.
FAQs About Clio vs MyCase
Which is easier to use, Clio or MyCase?
MyCase is generally easier to use with a more straightforward interface, while Clio offers more features but may take longer to learn.
Can both platforms handle client intake?
Yes, but Clio offers more customizable intake forms and lead management, while MyCase provides a simpler intake process.
Which is better for small law firms?
MyCase is typically better for small firms due to its simplicity and ease of use.
Does Clio or MyCase have better document management?
Clio offers more advanced document management with automation and integrations, while MyCase focuses on basic storage and ease of use.
How do their pricing models differ?
Clio has flexible, tiered pricing based on features, while MyCase offers a single, flat-rate plan.
The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information. This website contains links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser. Readers of this website should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information on this site without first seeking legal advice from counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website authors, contributors, contributing law firms, or committee members and their respective employers.
