Breaking Down the Litigation Process
Breaking Down the Litigation Process
Litigation follows a structured series of phases, each one with its own demands, deadlines, and decisions. From early case assessment to post-trial motions, staying organized is what helps you maintain consistency, avoid delays, and respond effectively as the case develops.
Many legal teams rely on litigation management software to support that structure. It helps track filings, manage documents, and coordinate tasks across phases without losing momentum.
But we still need to go back to the core: understanding the process from the inside out. Knowing how each phase works is what gives you the clarity to make the right calls, keep your team aligned, and manage litigation with more control.

Different Phases of the Litigation Process
If you’re managing an active litigation workflow, you already know how important timing and structure are. Each phase in the process brings its own requirements, from filing and discovery to trial and post-judgment steps.
Knowing what to expect and when can help you stay organized, meet deadlines, and keep your team aligned throughout the case.
1. Pre-Litigation and Case Assessment
Before a lawsuit is filed, there’s often a phase of evaluation and strategy. This stage is essential in civil litigation, especially when dealing with complex matters involving two or more parties, such as partnership disputes, contract breaches, or other forms of business conflict.
During pre-litigation, you’re:
- Gathering facts
- Reviewing litigation documents
- Assessing potential claims or defenses
It also involves determining the likelihood of resolving disputes without court involvement. This may involve internal investigations, settlement discussions, or demand letters aimed at reaching an early resolution.
Clear case assessment at this point helps reduce surprises later. You can identify risks, estimate costs, and determine whether litigation is the right path or if alternative solutions make more sense.
For companies involved in frequent legal disputes, this phase also helps prioritize which matters require immediate legal action versus those that can be managed informally.
2. Filing the Complaint
If informal efforts fail to resolve the dispute, the litigation process begins with the filing of the complaint. This is the formal start of a civil case. The plaintiff files a complaint with the appropriate court, outlining:
- The legal and factual basis for the claim
- The parties involved
- The relief sought
In business litigation, this step is often detailed and technical. You’re not just explaining what happened; you’re setting the tone for how the court will handle the dispute. The court system uses this document to initiate the case and assign deadlines for the defendant’s response.
Filing also triggers procedural steps. The complaint must be served on the opposing party, starting the clock for them to answer or file pre-trial motions such as a motion to dismiss. These motions can delay or narrow the case early on, depending on the strength of the claims.
This step requires careful attention to detail. If you’re involved in a civil case, either as the party filing or responding, accuracy and clarity in the complaint can shape the rest of the matter. It’s the first formal chance to tell the court your side and push the litigation forward.
3. Response and Preliminary Motions
After the complaint is filed and served, the defendant must respond, typically within 20 to 30 days, depending on the court’s rules. This response can take several forms: an answer that admits or denies each allegation, or a preliminary motion challenging the complaint itself.
One common preliminary motion is a motion to dismiss. For example, in a business litigation case, a company might argue that the plaintiff failed to state a legal claim or that the court lacks jurisdiction. If the motion succeeds, parts of the case (or the entire case) may be dismissed before discovery begins.
Filing a strong answer or motion requires analyzing the claims, identifying weaknesses, and deciding whether to contest facts, legal grounds, or both. Strategic use of preliminary motions can limit the scope of litigation early, which can save time and resources.
Even if the motion doesn’t result in dismissal, it sets up important arguments for later phases of the case.
4. Discovery
This is where things get detailed. Discovery is the part of the litigation process where both sides exchange information, legal documents, and evidence related to the case.
If you’re involved in a civil procedure, this stage helps you understand what the other party knows and gives you a chance to build your argument before trial.
The discovery period can last a few weeks or stretch over several months, depending on the complexity of the case. And while it may feel slow at times, this is where the groundwork for your outcome is set.
You’ll likely encounter tools like:
- Interrogatories: Written questions that require sworn answers.
- Requests for production: Document and data requests from the other side.
- Requests for admission: Statements to confirm or dispute.
- Depositions: Sworn testimony recorded before trial.
- Expert witness disclosures: Summaries of expert opinions and qualifications.
A strong discovery strategy helps avoid surprises and clarifies what you’re up against. The more organized and proactive you are here, the more control you’ll have later in the trial process.
5. Pre-Trial
The pre-trial phase sets the stage for what happens in the courtroom. It’s where both sides prepare their arguments, exchange final disclosures, and attempt to narrow the issues before the case moves forward in the legal system.
This period can include:
- Settlement discussions
- Pre-trial motions
- Evidentiary hearings
- Scheduling conferences
In a civil action, this stage often determines how much time a case will take in court, or whether it will even reach trial at all. Many disputes are resolved during this phase through negotiated agreements or rulings that eliminate the need for a full trial.
For example, in a federal court case involving a partnership dispute, the parties might file motions to exclude certain evidence or request summary judgment if they believe the facts are undisputed. If the judge agrees, it could prevent the case from advancing further in the public court system.
Pre-trial activity is a highly formal process governed by strict procedural rules. It also gives both parties a last opportunity to resolve the matter earlier to reduce litigation costs and avoid public exposure in the courtroom.
If resolution isn’t reached, everything that happens here shapes how legal rights will be argued and ultimately decided, before a judge or jury in a higher court.
6. Trial
If no resolution is reached during earlier stages, the case moves to trial. Trial is the most public and structured part of the litigation process. Trials follow strict federal rules or state procedures and can take anywhere from a few days to multiple years.
The trial stage is where the legal system formally hears and resolves disputes. One party presents evidence to support their claims, and the other defends against them.
In civil litigation, the burden of proof is lower than in criminal cases, and the outcome can be decided by a judge or jury.
Key aspects of the trial include:
- Opening statements from both sides
- Presentation of evidence and examination of witnesses
- Cross-examination by the opposing party
- Closing arguments summarizing each side’s position
- A final decision, either a judge’s ruling or a jury verdict
Although the trial is central to the process of resolving disputes, many civil cases never reach this point. Parties often settle or use alternative dispute resolution methods like mediation or arbitration to avoid the time, cost, and uncertainty of trial.
But when a case proceeds, trial is where each side has a formal chance to argue its case and seek a binding decision.
7. Post-Trial and Appeals
After the trial concludes, the process doesn’t always end there. Post-trial actions and appeals are common, especially in civil litigation involving complex or high-stakes issues.
If one party believes the outcome was flawed due to legal error, jury misconduct, or another issue, they may appeal to a higher court.
Appeals focus on legal issues, not new evidence. The appellate court reviews the trial record and determines whether the law was applied correctly. This part of the litigation process can take anywhere from a few months to several years, depending on the court and the complexity of the case.
Post-trial steps often include:
- Filing motions to alter or set aside the judgment
- Requesting a new trial based on procedural errors
- Preparing an appeal for a higher court to review the case
- Enforcing or collecting the judgment if no appeal is made
For example, a business owner involved in a partnership dispute may appeal a jury verdict if they believe key evidence was wrongly excluded. Even if both parties waive their right to appeal, lawyers often assist with final compliance steps to ensure judgments are enforced.
Like the trial itself, the post-trial phase can be a lengthy process, but it’s essential for protecting legal rights and ensuring fair outcomes.
Simplify the Litigation Process With Briefpoint
You already know the litigation process isn’t light work. From initial case assessments to post-trial motions, it’s a constant stream of documents, deadlines, and decisions. Even if you’ve done it a hundred times, it can still eat up more hours than it should, especially during discovery.
Briefpoint helps you get some of that time back.
Instead of building discovery responses from scratch or toggling between formatting rules, you upload your documents, choose objections, and download clean, court-ready drafts. Just a faster way to move through one of the most time-consuming phases of litigation.
If you’re handling high volumes of cases or want more time to focus on legal strategy, Briefpoint can give you space to do that. It’s designed to support the way you already work, just with fewer delays.
Book a demo and see how much smoother your litigation workflow can run!
FAQs About the Litigation Process
What is the litigation procedure?
The litigation procedure refers to the formal process used to handle disputes through the court system. It includes several phases: pre-litigation assessment, filing the complaint, response and motions, discovery, pre-trial, trial, and post-trial or appeal. Each stage follows a set of civil procedure rules.
Is it better to settle or litigate?
It depends on the case. Settlement often reduces court costs and resolves matters in a short period. However, some disputes require litigation, especially if there’s a need to establish precedent, protect legal rights, or when parties can’t agree on terms.
What are the 5 steps to initiate a lawsuit?
The basic steps include:
- Pre-litigation assessment
- Filing the complaint
- Serving the defendant
- Defendant’s response
- Preliminary motions
What is the correct order of the phases of litigation?
The typical order is:
- Pre-litigation and case assessment
- Filing the complaint
- Response and motions
- Discovery
- Pre-trial
- Trial (where a jury decides, if applicable)
- Post-trial and appeals, where outcomes are often decision-based.
How does alternative dispute resolution differ from the court system?
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) refers to methods like mediation and arbitration that resolve legal disputes outside of the traditional court system. ADR is often faster, less formal, and more cost-effective than litigation. Unlike a courtroom trial, where a judge or jury decides the outcome, ADR processes are typically more collaborative and confidential. Many civil disputes, including business and partnership conflicts, are successfully resolved through ADR before reaching trial.
The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information.
This website contains links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser. Readers of this website should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information on this site without first seeking legal advice from counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website authors, contributors, contributing law firms, or committee members and their respective employers.